lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOw6vbKKbbZkEeHD5UOOqDAvMAZD8_Zd5i241XhXhfa+VsB+DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:23:21 -0400
From:	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel@...inux.com, patrice.chotard@...com,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	vincent.abriou@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
> new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or
> a *_shared line when requesting reset lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> @@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int sti_compositor_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         }
>
>         /* Get reset resources */
> -       compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");
> +       compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");

Seems like this patch also changes the behavior from being exclusively
managed to shared. Is this intentional? If so, it's probably worth
changing you commit message to be a little less innocuous.

>         /* Take compo main out of reset */
>         if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))
>                 reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);
>
> -       compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");
> +       compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");
>         /* Take compo aux out of reset */
>         if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))
>                 reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);
> --
> 2.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ