[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160722153656.GR3122@ubuntu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:36:56 -0700
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>
Cc: Jacob Tanenbaum <jtanenba@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: update default value of
cpuinfo_transition_latency"
On 22-07-16, 17:14, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> index a7ecb9a..3f0ce2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
> @@ -555,8 +555,6 @@ static int pcc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> policy->min = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq =
> ioread32(&pcch_hdr->minimum_frequency) * 1000;
>
> - policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL;
> -
> pr_debug("init: policy->max is %d, policy->min is %d\n",
> policy->max, policy->min);
> out:
Hi Rafael,
I am very confused on this, can you help me understand ?
- CPUFREQ_ETERNAL = -1
- unsigned int transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, will set it to UINT_MAX.
- Many drivers do it today
cpufreq.c
if (policy->governor->max_transition_latency &&
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency >
policy->governor->max_transition_latency) {
- And this check will always fail, unless max_transition_latency is zero.
What am I missing ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists