linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: Remove reclaim and compaction retry approximations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:57:40 -0400
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: Remove reclaim and compaction retry
 approximations

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 03:10:59PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> If per-zone LRU accounting is available then there is no point
> approximating whether reclaim and compaction should retry based on pgdat
> statistics. This is effectively a revert of "mm, vmstat: remove zone and
> node double accounting by approximating retries" with the difference that
> inactive/active stats are still available. This preserves the history of
> why the approximation was retried and why it had to be reverted to handle
> OOM kills on 32-bit systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>

I like this version of should_reclaim_retry() much better ;)

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>