linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:39:45 -0700
From:	Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
	Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@...eaurora.org>,
	Patrick Daly <pdaly@...eaurora.org>,
	Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>,
	Thomas Zeng <tzeng@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Add support for privileged mappings

On Fri, Jul 22 2016 at 05:51:07 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:36:49PM -0700, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> The following patch to the ARM SMMU driver:
>> 
>>     commit d346180e70b91b3d5a1ae7e5603e65593d4622bc
>>     Author: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>>     Date:   Tue Jan 26 18:06:34 2016 +0000
>>     
>>         iommu/arm-smmu: Treat all device transactions as unprivileged
>> 
>> started forcing all SMMU transactions to come through as "unprivileged".
>> The rationale given was that:
>> 
>>   (1) There is no way in the IOMMU API to even request privileged mappings.
>> 
>>   (2) It's difficult to implement a DMA mapper that correctly models the
>>       ARM VMSAv8 behavior of unprivileged-writeable =>
>>       privileged-execute-never.
>> 
>> This series rectifies (1) by introducing an IOMMU API for privileged
>> mappings and implements it in io-pgtable-arm.
>> 
>> This series rectifies (2) by introducing a new dma attribute
>> (DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED) for users of the DMA API that need privileged
>> mappings which are inaccessible to lesser-privileged execution levels, and
>> implements it in the arm64 IOMMU DMA mapper.  The one known user (pl330.c)
>> is converted over to the new attribute.
>> 
>> Jordan and Jeremy can provide more info on the use case if needed, but the
>> high level is that it's a security feature to prevent attacks such as [1].
>
> This all looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>
> It looks pretty fiddly to merge, however. How are you planning to get
> this upstream?

Fiddly in what way?  Do you mean in relation to "dma-mapping: Use
unsigned long for dma_attrs" [1]?  I admit I wasn't aware of that
activity until Robin mentioned it.  It looks like it's merged on
next/master, shall I rebase/rework on that and resend?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/13/198


-Mitch

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project