linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/3] extend kexec_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1732711.nTAkJm8nA3@hactar>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:41:40 -0300
From:	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, bhe@...hat.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@...dozajonas.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] extend kexec_file_load system call

Am Freitag, 22 Juli 2016, 12:54:28 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > So even if not ideal, the solution above is desirable for powerpc. We
> > would like to preserve the ability of allowing userspace to pass
> > parameters to the OS via the DTB, even if secure boot is enabled.
> > 
> > I would like to turn the above into a proposal:
> > 
> > Extend the syscall as shown in this RFC from Takahiro AKASHI, but
> > instead of accepting a complete DTB from userspace, the syscall accepts
> > a DTB containing only a /chosen node. If the DTB contains any other
> > node, the syscall fails with EINVAL. If the DTB contains any subnode in
> > /chosen, or if there's a compatible or device_type property in /chosen,
> > the syscall fails with EINVAL as well.
> > 
> > The kernel can then add the properties in /chosen to the device tree
> > that it will pass to the next kernel.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> I think we will inevitably have someone who wants to pass something
> other than a child of /chosen.
> 
> At that point we would be faced with adding yet another syscall, or at
> best a new flag.
> 
> I think we'd be better allowing userspace to pass a DTB, and having an
> explicit whitelist (in the kernel) of which nodes & properties are
> allowed in that DTB.

Sounds good to me.

> For starters it would only contain /chosen/stdout-path (for example).
> But we would be able to add new nodes & properties in future.

If we allow things outside of chosen, we can keep the offb.c hook in 
Petitboot and whitelist the framebuffer properties it adds to the vga node.

> The downside is userspace would have no way of detecting the content of
> the white list, other than trial and error. But in practice I'm not sure
> that would be a big problem.

For our use case in OpenPower I don't think it would be a problem, since the 
userspace and the kernel are developed together.

-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center