[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160722210919.GC3122@ubuntu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:09:19 -0700
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: Disallow ->resolve_freq() for drivers
providing ->target_index()
On 22-07-16, 23:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> No, they aren't deprecated, not even sort of.
>
> Of course, stuff that can use frequency tables should implement ->target_index,
> because there's no valid reason for it not to do that.
>
> However, there are cases (and not legacy) where frequency tables are simply
> impractical and those drivers have no choice but to implement ->target.
>
> And if you want to try to force them into the frequency tables model
> regardless, then think twice, because I'm not going to let you do that.
No I am not :)
Perhaps this was just mis-worded in the Documentation then.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists