[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160724011757.GB33568@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 18:17:58 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] samples/bpf: Add test/example of using
bpf_probe_write_user bpf helper
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:44:11PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> This example shows using a kprobe to act as a dnat mechanism to divert
> traffic for arbitrary endpoints. It rewrite the arguments to a syscall
> while they're still in userspace, and before the syscall has a chance
> to copy the argument into kernel space.
>
> Although this is an example, it also acts as a test because the mapped
> address is 255.255.255.255:555 -> real address, and that's not a legal
> address to connect to. If the helper is broken, the example will fail.
nice. makes sense.
> Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
...
> +/* Copyright (c) 2013-2015 PLUMgrid, http://plumgrid.com
hmm, not sure what to think about this line.
plumgrid got a new employee? ;)
> + if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
> + printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Is the server's getsockname = the socket getpeername */
> + assert(memcmp(&serv_addr, &tmp_addr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in)) == 0);
thanks. so the $?==0 will indicate success, right?
After respin feel free to add my ack.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists