[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57946982.7050209@rock-chips.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 15:08:50 +0800
From: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Yao <yzq@...k-chips.com>, Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/rockchip: add an common abstracted PSR driver
Doug,
On 07/23/2016 12:04 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Yakir,
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>> +static void psr_set_state(struct psr_drv *psr, enum psr_state state)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&psr->state_mutex);
>> +
>> + if (psr->state == state) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&psr->state_mutex);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + psr->state = state;
>> + switch (state) {
>> + case PSR_ENABLE:
>> + psr->set(psr->encoder, true);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case PSR_DISABLE:
>> + case PSR_FLUSH:
>> + psr->set(psr->encoder, false);
>> + break;
>> + };
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&psr->state_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void psr_flush_handler(unsigned long data)
>> +{
>> + struct psr_drv *psr = (struct psr_drv *)data;
>> +
>> + if (!psr || psr->state != PSR_FLUSH)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + psr_set_state(psr, PSR_ENABLE);
> As mentioned in a separate thread, this is probably not OK.
> psr_set_state() grabs a mutex and that might sleep. ...but
> psr_flush_handler() is a timer. I'm nearly certain that timers can't
> sleep.
>
> I believe this is the source of "sleeping function called from invalid
> context" that I've seen at times.
Thanks for your reported, i have wrote a patch[0] to fix this problem in
my v5. If you're happy to review, that would be great ;)
[0]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9244805/
- Yakir
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists