[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607250846560.23039@east.gentwo.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:48:25 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] vfs: Use dlock list for SB's s_inodes list
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Waiman Long wrote:
> - Add a new patch to make the percpu head structure cacheline aligned
> to prevent cacheline contention from disrupting the performance
> of nearby percpu variables.
It would be better not to use the percpu allocation etc for this.
Given the frequency of off node data access I would say that the data
structure does not qualify as per cpu data. You have per cpu data items
yes but this is not used as per cpu data.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists