[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160725162332.GA23935@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:23:32 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wang Shu <shuwang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] introduce for_each_process_thread_{break,continue}()
helpers
Hello,
IMHO this makes sense in any case, but mostly this is preparation for
another change: show_state_filter() should be preemptible. But this needs
more discussion, I'll write another email/patch when I fully understand
the hard-lockup caused by sysrq-t.
Oleg.
include/linux/sched.h | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/exit.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/hung_task.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists