[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1469427937.26205.19.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:25:37 +0800
From: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Cawa Cheng <cawa.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Junzhi Zhao <junzhi.zhao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/mediatek: fix the wrong pixel clock when
resolution is 4K
Hi, Philipp,
Thanks for your comment.
On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 11:41 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.07.2016, 12:03 +0800 schrieb Bibby Hsieh:
> > From: Junzhi Zhao <junzhi.zhao@...iatek.com>
> >
> > Pixel clock should be 297MHz when resolution is 4K.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Junzhi Zhao <junzhi.zhao@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > index d05ca79..c0f04d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> > @@ -60,14 +60,35 @@ enum mtk_dpi_out_color_format {
> > MTK_DPI_COLOR_FORMAT_YCBCR_422_FULL
> > };
> >
> > +enum mtk_dpi_clk_id {
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_DPI_ENGINE,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_DPI_PIXEL,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_TVD_PLL,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_TVDPLL_MUX,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_TVDPLL_D2,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_TVDPLL_D4,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_TVDPLL_D8,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_TVDPLL_D16,
> > + MTK_DPI_CLK_COUNT,
> > +};
>
> I think this is going in the wrong direction. If the pixel clock output
> isn't correct after a clk_set_rate(dpi->pixel_clk, rate), the clock
> drivers should be fixed, not worked around in the dpi driver.
>
> The TVDPLL_* mux and dividers are not direct inputs to the DPI module:
>
> tvdpll ("pll")
> | ..|\
> v ..| | mm_sel ----> mm_dpi_engine ("engine")
> tvdpll_594m(1/3) ..|/
> |
> |`-> tvdpll_d2 -->|\
> |`-> tvdpll_d4 -->| | dpi0_sel --> mm_dpi_pixel ("pixel")
> |`-> tvdpll_d8 -->| |
> `--> tvdpll_d16 ->|/
>
> Currently the code first sets the "pll" to the desired multiple of the
> pixel clock manually (*3*4, *3*8) and than calls clk_set_rate on the
> "pixel" clock which gets propagated by the clock framework up to
> dpi0_sel. Since dpi0_sel doesn't have the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag set,
> it should just choose the tvdpll_d* input divider. I'd like not to give
> the dpi driver direct access to all the intermediate clocks.
>
Ok, I will make some modifications according to your comment.
> regards
> Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists