linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160726075324.0aa6c782@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:53:24 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:21:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:35:36 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > 
> > > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >     
> > > > Hi Ingo,
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:28:38 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:    
> > > > >
> > > > >       tools: Copy the bitops files accessed from the kernel and check for drift    
> > > > 
> > > > I think this has some needs some fixes for build breakage in linux-next ...    
> > > 
> > > Only if combined with a single pending change from the luto-next tree, right?    
> > 
> > ... which commits come through the x86 tree, so there's no way for Linus to be 
> > exposed to that, right?
> > 
> > That is why I sent this without mentioning the conflict. Is there any other 
> > complication that I missed?  
> 
> Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build
> problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build
> failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency).
> After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly
> before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ...

Now that this is fixed and merged into the tip tree, I have removed the
perf tree from linux-next.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell