linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.6 049/203] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160725203431.266849826@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:54:24 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 049/203] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2()

4.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>

commit 5cc1fb2a093e254b656c64ff24b0b76bed1d34d9 upstream.

To avoid racing entry into nfs4_get_vfs_file().
Make init_open_stateid() return with locked stateid to be unlocked
by the caller.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3487,6 +3487,10 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid
 	struct nfs4_openowner *oo = open->op_openowner;
 	struct nfs4_ol_stateid *retstp = NULL;
 
+	/* We are moving these outside of the spinlocks to avoid the warnings */
+	mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
+
 	spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
 	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
 
@@ -3502,13 +3506,17 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid
 	stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
 	stp->st_deny_bmap = 0;
 	stp->st_openstp = NULL;
-	mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
 	list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &oo->oo_owner.so_stateids);
 	list_add(&stp->st_perfile, &fp->fi_stateids);
 
 out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
+	if (retstp) {
+		mutex_lock(&retstp->st_mutex);
+		/* Not that we need to, just for neatness */
+		mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
+	}
 	return retstp;
 }
 
@@ -4344,11 +4352,14 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 	} else {
 		stp = open->op_stp;
 		open->op_stp = NULL;
+		/*
+		 * init_open_stateid() either returns a locked stateid
+		 * it found, or initializes and locks the new one we passed in
+		 */
 		swapstp = init_open_stateid(stp, fp, open);
 		if (swapstp) {
 			nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
 			stp = swapstp;
-			mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
 			status = nfs4_upgrade_open(rqstp, fp, current_fh,
 						stp, open);
 			if (status) {
@@ -4357,7 +4368,6 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 			}
 			goto upgrade_out;
 		}
-		mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
 		status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open);
 		if (status) {
 			mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);