linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] userns: Add per user namespace sysctls.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877fc92gm8.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:00:31 -0500
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	luto@...capital.net, seth.forshee@...onical.com, kernel@...p.com,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	jann@...jh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] userns: Add per user namespace sysctls.

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:44:50 -0500
>
>> User namespaces have enabled unprivileged users access to a lot more
>> data structures and so to catch programs that go crazy we need a lot
>> more limits.  I believe some of those limits make sense per namespace.
>> As it is easy in some cases to say any more than Y number of those
>> per namespace is excessive.   For example a limit of 1,000,000 ipv4
>> routes per network namespaces is a sanity check as there are
>> currently 621,649 ipv4 prefixes advertized in bgp.
>
> When we give a new namespace to unprivileged users, we honestly should
> make the sysctl settings we give to them become "limits".  They can
> further constrain the sysctl settings but may not raise them.

I won't disagree.  I was thinking in terms of global setting that
hold the limits for per namespace counters.  As we are talking sanity
check limits.

Perhaps we could get sophisticated and do something more but the simpler
we can make things and get the job done the better.

Eric