linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:45:51 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> > > That is why I sent this without mentioning the conflict. Is there any other 
> > > complication that I missed?
> > 
> > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build problem, 
> > the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build failure in 
> > linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency). After the build failed, 
> > I started including the perf tree directly before the tip tree and the build 
> > would fail when I merged that ...
> 
> Now that this is fixed and merged into the tip tree, I have removed the perf 
> tree from linux-next.

Ok, thanks - and sorry about this - I'll get the tooling fixes to Linus ASAP.

Thanks,

	Ingo