linux-kernel - Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] GFS2: use BIT() macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:02:17 +0200
From:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
To:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc:	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
	cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/1 linux-next] GFS2: use BIT() macro

Fabian,

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be> wrote:
> Replace 1 << value shift by more explicit BIT() macro
>
> Also fixes two bare unsigned definitions:
>
> WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> +               unsigned hsize = BIT(ip->i_depth);

this patch is looking good. I'm adding it to my for-next queue.

Thanks,
Andreas