[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160726094858.3aa96e18@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:48:58 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, jic23@...nel.org,
knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wens@...e.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with
late_initcall
Hello,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:43:44 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> -module_platform_driver(iio_hwmon_driver);
> +static struct platform_driver * const drivers[] = {
> + &iio_hwmon_driver,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init iio_hwmon_late_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_register_drivers(drivers, ARRAY_SIZE(drivers));
Why not platform_register_driver() ?
This would avoid the need to declare an array with just one entry.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists