| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160726082701.GA9950@bbox>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:27:01 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 08:46:50AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:21:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > I believe proper fix is to modify get_scan_count. IOW, I think
> > > > we should introduce lruvec_reclaimable_lru_size with proper
> > > > classzone_idx but I don't know how we can fix it with memcg
> > > > which doesn't have zone stat now. should introduce zone stat
> > > > back to memcg? Or, it's okay to ignore memcg?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think it's ok to ignore memcg in this case as a memcg shrink is often
> > > going to be for pages that can use highmem anyway.
> >
> > So, you mean it's okay to ignore kmemcg case?
> > If memcg guys agree it, I want to make get_scan_count consider
> > reclaimable lru size under the reclaim constraint, instead.
> >
>
> For now, I believe yet. My understanding is that the primary use cases
> for kmemcg is systems running large numbers of containers. It consider
> it extremely unlikely that large 32-bit systems are being used for large
> numbers of containers and require usage of kmemcg.
Okay, Then how about this?
I didn't test it but I guess it should work.
>From 8f9f04045724d0d5752d100b94d060183e5a0f7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:57:27 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] mm: get_scan_count consider reclaimable lru pages
With node-lru, if there are enough reclaimable pages in highmem
but nothing in lowmem, VM can try to shrink inactive list although
the requested zone is lowmem.
The problem is that if the inactive list is full of highmem pages then a
direct reclaimer searching for a lowmem page waste CPU scanning uselessly.
It just burns out CPU. Even, many direct reclaimers are stalled by
too_many_isolated if lots of parallel reclaimer are going on although
there are no reclaimable memory in inactive list.
To solve the issue, get_scan_count should consider reclaimable
lru size.
I tried the experiment 4 times in 32bit 2G 8 CPU KVM machine to get
elapsed time.
hackbench 500 process 2
= Old =
1st: 289s 2nd: 310s 3rd: 112s 4th: 272s
= Now =
1st: 31s 2nd: 132s 3rd: 162s 4th: 50s
Not-yet-Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 +-
mm/vmscan.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
mm/workingset.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index d572b78..87d186f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -805,7 +805,8 @@ static inline struct pglist_data *lruvec_pgdat(struct lruvec *lruvec)
#endif
}
-extern unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru);
+extern unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru,
+ int classzone);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORY_PRESENT
void memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e5af357..c27e307 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -234,12 +234,33 @@ bool pgdat_reclaimable(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
pgdat_reclaimable_pages(pgdat) * 6;
}
-unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru)
+/*
+ * Return size of lru list zones[0..classzone_idx] if memcg is disabled.
+ */
+unsigned long lruvec_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru,
+ int classzone_idx)
{
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat;
+ unsigned long nr_pages, nr_zone_pages;
+ int zid;
+ struct zone *zone;
+
if (!mem_cgroup_disabled())
return mem_cgroup_get_lru_size(lruvec, lru);
- return node_page_state(lruvec_pgdat(lruvec), NR_LRU_BASE + lru);
+ pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+ nr_pages = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_LRU_BASE + lru);
+
+ for (zid = classzone_idx + 1; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
+ zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zid];
+ if (!populated_zone(zone))
+ continue;
+
+ nr_zone_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + lru);
+ nr_pages -= min(nr_pages, nr_zone_pages);
+ }
+
+ return nr_pages;
}
/*
@@ -1481,13 +1502,6 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
total_skipped += nr_skipped[zid];
}
- /*
- * Account skipped pages as a partial scan as the pgdat may be
- * close to unreclaimable. If the LRU list is empty, account
- * skipped pages as a full scan.
- */
- scan += list_empty(src) ? total_skipped : total_skipped >> 2;
-
list_splice(&pages_skipped, src);
}
*nr_scanned = scan;
@@ -1995,34 +2009,9 @@ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
if (!file && !total_swap_pages)
return false;
- inactive = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE);
- active = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE + LRU_ACTIVE);
-
- /*
- * For global reclaim on zone-constrained allocations, it is necessary
- * to check if rotations are required for lowmem to be reclaimed. This
- * calculates the inactive/active pages available in eligible zones.
- */
- if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
- struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
- int zid;
-
- for (zid = sc->reclaim_idx + 1; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
- struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[zid];
- unsigned long inactive_zone, active_zone;
-
- if (!populated_zone(zone))
- continue;
-
- inactive_zone = zone_page_state(zone,
- NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + (file * LRU_FILE));
- active_zone = zone_page_state(zone,
- NR_ZONE_LRU_BASE + (file * LRU_FILE) + LRU_ACTIVE);
-
- inactive -= min(inactive, inactive_zone);
- active -= min(active, active_zone);
- }
- }
+ inactive = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE, sc->reclaim_idx);
+ active = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE + LRU_ACTIVE,
+ sc->reclaim_idx);
gb = (inactive + active) >> (30 - PAGE_SHIFT);
if (gb)
@@ -2136,21 +2125,20 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* anon pages. Try to detect this based on file LRU size.
*/
if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
- unsigned long pgdatfile;
- unsigned long pgdatfree;
- int z;
+ unsigned long pgdatfile = 0;
+ unsigned long pgdatfree = 0;
unsigned long total_high_wmark = 0;
+ int z;
- pgdatfree = sum_zone_node_page_state(pgdat->node_id, NR_FREE_PAGES);
- pgdatfile = node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
- node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
-
- for (z = 0; z < MAX_NR_ZONES; z++) {
+ for (z = 0; z <= sc->reclaim_idx; z++) {
struct zone *zone = &pgdat->node_zones[z];
if (!populated_zone(zone))
continue;
total_high_wmark += high_wmark_pages(zone);
+ pgdatfree += zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
+ pgdatfile += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE);
+ pgdatfile += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE);
}
if (unlikely(pgdatfile + pgdatfree <= total_high_wmark)) {
@@ -2169,7 +2157,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* system is under heavy pressure.
*/
if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, true, sc) &&
- lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE) >> sc->priority) {
+ lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE, sc->reclaim_idx)
+ >> sc->priority) {
scan_balance = SCAN_FILE;
goto out;
}
@@ -2195,10 +2184,10 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
* anon in [0], file in [1]
*/
- anon = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON) +
- lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON);
- file = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) +
- lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
+ anon = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx) +
+ lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx);
+ file = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, sc->reclaim_idx) +
+ lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE, sc->reclaim_idx);
spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
if (unlikely(reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] > anon / 4)) {
@@ -2236,7 +2225,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
unsigned long size;
unsigned long scan;
- size = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, lru);
+ size = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, lru, sc->reclaim_idx);
scan = size >> sc->priority;
if (!scan && pass && force_scan)
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 69551cf..0c71027 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ bool workingset_refault(void *shadow)
}
lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(pgdat, memcg);
refault = atomic_long_read(&lruvec->inactive_age);
- active_file = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE);
+ active_file = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE, MAX_NR_ZONES - 1);
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists