[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b5a7bb5-6670-606b-e33d-63cd8b0fcedd@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:20:58 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: <rcochran@...utronix.de>
CC: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 61/66] timers: Convert to hotplug state machine
On 25/07/16 16:35, rcochran@...utronix.de wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:56:48PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> There is a hidden dependency between:
>>>
>>> - timers
>>> - Block multiqueue
>>> - rcutree
>>>
>>> If timers_dead_cpu() comes later than blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify()
>>> that latter function causes a RCU stall.
>>
>> After this change is applied I am seeing RCU stalls during suspend
>> on Tegra. I guess I am hitting the case mentioned above? How should
>> this be avoided?
>
> The problem that I had found was a hidden dependency. When I
> initially placed the timers callback into the new HP state list, that
> caused a stall because the dependency was broken. The old code worked
> by luck, based on the order of the notifier registrations. The new
> code makes the old implicit ordering explicit, so it should work just
> as well as before (famous last words).
I see.
>> Interestingly I am only seeing the above when using the ARM
>> multi_v7_defconfig kernel configuration and not with the tegra_defconfig.
>> One key difference between these is that the multi_v7_defconfig does not
>> have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled. Initial testing shows enabling CONFIG_PREEMPT
>> for multi_v7_defconfig makes the problem go away.
>
> Just to be sure, this problem didn't exist before the HP rework, that
> is, suspend worked fine with and without CONFIG_PREEMPT, right?
Correct. I test suspend on Tegra with both multi_v7_defconfig
(CONFIG_PREEMPT disabled) and tegra_defconfig (CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled).
Looking at the git history for these configs I don't see any changes in
this regard since they were added (unless some underlying Kconfig files
have changed).
> I see if I can find a tegra system to test with...
Thanks. I have not tried another ARM based device, but I would be
curious if another ARM device sees this or not.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists