linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f4966105-a8ff-c24c-608c-9aff66ad956b@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:58:54 -0400
From:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree

On 07/26/2016 12:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   4c9075835511 ("xen/x86: Move irq allocation from Xen smp_op.cpu_up()")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
>   88e957d6e47f ("xen: introduce xen_vcpu_id mapping")
>
> from the xen-tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>

Thank you Stephen. Both this and arch/x86/xen/smp.c merges (from another
message) look good.

-boris