[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1469555635.2851.10.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:53:55 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/2] e1000e: convert systim overflow check to
use flags2
On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 13:39 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Per Jesse Brandeburg, e1000e should be using flags for this sort of
> thing.
>
> Littering functional code with device-specific checks is much messier
> than
> simply checking a flag, and having device-specific init set flags as
> needed.
> There are probably a number of other cases in the e1000e code that
> could/should be converted similarly.
>
> At present, this patch is a follow-up to the previously submitted 2
> patches, but I can redo the series to omit the conversion to a switch
> entirely, if so desired.
>
> Suggested-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> CC: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> CC: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 10 ++--------
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
This generates a compile issue, so I will be dropping this patch and will
await an update.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists