[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160726020735.GB23617@outlook.office365.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:07:36 -0700
From: Andrew Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"criu@...nvz.org" <criu@...nvz.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 RFC] Add an interface to discover relationships
between namespaces
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:10:21AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I forgot to add --cc-cover for git send-email, so everyone who is in
> > Cc got only a cover letter. All messages were sent in mail lists.
> >
> > Sorry for inconvenience.
>
> Mostly the code looked sensible. But I had a couple of issues.
> Resend this in September (when the merge window is closed and I am back
> from vacation) and I will give this a thorough review and get this
> merged. Or possibly next week if Linus releases another -rc
Eric, thank you for the detailed comments. I will rework this series and
send it after the merge window.
>
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org> wrote:
> >> Each namespace has an owning user namespace and now there is not way
> >> to discover these relationships.
> >>
> >> Pid and user namepaces are hierarchical. There is no way to discover
> >> parent-child relationships too.
> >>
> >> Why we may want to know relationships between namespaces?
> >>
> >> One use would be visualization, in order to understand the running system.
> >> Another would be to answer the question: what capability does process X have to
> >> perform operations on a resource governed by namespace Y?
> >>
> >> One more use-case (which usually called abnormal) is checkpoint/restart.
> >> In CRIU we age going to dump and restore nested namespaces.
> >>
> >> There [1] was a discussion about which interface to choose to determing
> >> relationships between namespaces.
> >>
> >> Eric suggested to add two ioctl-s [2]:
> >>> Grumble, Grumble. I think this may actually a case for creating ioctls
> >>> for these two cases. Now that random nsfs file descriptors are bind
> >>> mountable the original reason for using proc files is not as pressing.
> >>>
> >>> One ioctl for the user namespace that owns a file descriptor.
> >>> One ioctl for the parent namespace of a namespace file descriptor.
> >>
> >> Here is an implementaions of these ioctl-s.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/6/158
> >> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/9/101
> >>
> >> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> >> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> >> Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
> >> Cc: "W. Trevor King" <wking@...mily.us>
> >> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> >> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
>
>
> Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists