| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1469492520.30053.123.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:00 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, x86@...nel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] mm: SLUB hardened usercopy support
On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 16:29 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 02:42 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 12:16 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > On 07/20/2016 01:27 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > Under CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY, this adds object size checking
> > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > SLUB allocator to catch any copies that may span objects.
> > > > Includes
> > > > a
> > > > redzone handling fix discovered by Michael Ellerman.
> > > >
> > > > Based on code from PaX and grsecurity.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > > > Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > > > ---
> > > > init/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > mm/slub.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > > > index 798c2020ee7c..1c4711819dfd 100644
> > > > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -1765,6 +1765,7 @@ config SLAB
> > > >
> > > > config SLUB
> > > > bool "SLUB (Unqueued Allocator)"
> > > > + select HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
> > > > help
> > > > SLUB is a slab allocator that minimizes cache line
> > > > usage
> > > > instead of managing queues of cached objects (SLAB
> > > > approach).
> > > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > > index 825ff4505336..7dee3d9a5843 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > > @@ -3614,6 +3614,42 @@ void *__kmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t
> > > > flags, int node)
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc_node);
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Rejects objects that are incorrectly sized.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Returns NULL if check passes, otherwise const char * to
> > > > name of
> > > > cache
> > > > + * to indicate an error.
> > > > + */
> > > > +const char *__check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long
> > > > n,
> > > > + struct page *page)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct kmem_cache *s;
> > > > + unsigned long offset;
> > > > + size_t object_size;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Find object and usable object size. */
> > > > + s = page->slab_cache;
> > > > + object_size = slab_ksize(s);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Find offset within object. */
> > > > + offset = (ptr - page_address(page)) % s->size;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Adjust for redzone and reject if within the
> > > > redzone. */
> > > > + if (kmem_cache_debug(s) && s->flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
> > > > + if (offset < s->red_left_pad)
> > > > + return s->name;
> > > > + offset -= s->red_left_pad;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Allow address range falling entirely within object
> > > > size. */
> > > > + if (offset <= object_size && n <= object_size -
> > > > offset)
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > +
> > > > + return s->name;
> > > > +}
> > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY */
> > > > +
> > >
> > > I compared this against what check_valid_pointer does for
> > > SLUB_DEBUG
> > > checking. I was hoping we could utilize that function to avoid
> > > duplication but a) __check_heap_object needs to allow accesses
> > > anywhere
> > > in the object, not just the beginning b) accessing page->objects
> > > is racy without the addition of locking in SLUB_DEBUG.
> > >
> > > Still, the ptr < page_address(page) check from
> > > __check_heap_object
> > > would
> > > be good to add to avoid generating garbage large offsets and
> > > trying
> > > to
> > > infer C math.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > > index 7dee3d9..5370e4f 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > > @@ -3632,6 +3632,9 @@ const char *__check_heap_object(const void
> > > *ptr, unsigned long n,
> > > s = page->slab_cache;
> > > object_size = slab_ksize(s);
> > >
> > > + if (ptr < page_address(page))
> > > + return s->name;
> > > +
> > > /* Find offset within object. */
> > > offset = (ptr - page_address(page)) % s->size;
> > >
> >
> > I don't get it, isn't that already guaranteed because we
> > look for the page that ptr is in, before __check_heap_object
> > is called?
> >
> > Specifically, in patch 3/12:
> >
> > + page = virt_to_head_page(ptr);
> > +
> > + /* Check slab allocator for flags and size. */
> > + if (PageSlab(page))
> > + return __check_heap_object(ptr, n, page);
> >
> > How can that generate a ptr that is not inside the page?
> >
> > What am I overlooking? And, should it be in the changelog or
> > a comment? :)
> >
>
>
> I ran into the subtraction issue when the vmalloc detection wasn't
> working on ARM64, somehow virt_to_head_page turned into a page
> that happened to have PageSlab set. I agree if everything is working
> properly this is redundant but given the type of feature this is, a
> little bit of redundancy against a system running off into the weeds
> or bad patches might be warranted.
>
That's fair. I have no objection to the check, but would
like to see it documented, since it does look a little out
of place.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists