[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160727103649.9e6ef332847b5a5c8fac66af@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:36:49 +0200
From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ux-sunxi.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: mux: Add support for mux tables
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:40:20 +0200
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > > Parenting functions would also not work as expected,
> > > clk_hw_get_parent_by_index being the obvious example, in that case
> > > returning the empty string for an invalid parent, while it should
> > > really return NULL.
> >
> > I don't see why the clock should be orphan.
> > Then, when a parent is "", clk_hw_get_parent_by_index() returns NULL.
>
> Why? It should return NULL when there's no parent, while you
> explicitly registered a parent.
"" is not an existing parent. It could be "none" / "dum" / "toto" / ...
with the same result: 'this index cannot be used in mux'.
--
Ken ar c'hentaƱ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists