[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160727092043.GA25086@Karyakshetra>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:50:43 +0530
From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"GeyslanG.Bem@...yakshetra" <geyslan@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>,
Saurabh Karajgaonkar <skarajga@...teon.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC] usb: host: u132-hcd: Remove deprecated
create_singlethread_workqueue
alloc_ordered_workqueue replaces the deprecated
create_singlethread_workqueue.
The workqueue "workqueue" has multiple workitems which may require
ordering. Hence, a dedicated ordered workqueue has been used.
Since the workqueue is not being used on a memory reclaim path,
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has not been set.
Can the workitems run concurrently? Is the ordering among work items
necessary?
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
index 43d5293..cbde189 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
@@ -3206,7 +3206,7 @@ static int __init u132_hcd_init(void)
if (usb_disabled())
return -ENODEV;
printk(KERN_INFO "driver %s\n", hcd_name);
- workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue("u132");
+ workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("u132", 0);
retval = platform_driver_register(&u132_platform_driver);
return retval;
}
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists