[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160727113759.GB7147@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:38:00 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
John Blackwood <john.blackwood@...r.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Vladimir Murzin <Vladimir.Murzin@....com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 04/10] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:19:59PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
[...]
> It is interesting to note that you force large_func() to stack its arguments
> (by providing 8 dummy int arguments first) then the implicit
> pass-by-reference behavior is still preserved even for a stacked argument;
> large_func() ends up as:
>
> ~~~
> large_func:
> ldr x0, [sp]
> ldr x0, [x0]
> ret
> ~~~
>
> Only thing is... I *still* haven't found anything in the AArch64 PCS which
> describes this behavior.
>
> I'm coming to believe that this is a mistake and this information (and the
> threshold at which implicit pass-by-reference kicks in) should be documented
> in section 7.
Is that answered by this?
B.3. If the argument type is a Composite Type that is larger than
16 bytes, then the argument is copied to memory allocated by the
caller and the argument is replaced by a pointer to the copy.
Experimenting with gcc's behaviour seems to back this up.
Cheers
---Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists