[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160727120609.GA3773@gauravjindalubtnb.del.spreadtrum.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:06:17 +0000
From: "Gaurav Jindal (Gaurav Jindal)" <Gaurav.Jindal@...eadtrum.com>
To: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sanjeev Yadav (Sanjeev Kumar Yadav)" <Sanjeev.Yadav@...eadtrum.com>
Subject: [PATCH]optimize error handling in tick_check_new_device
In the function tick_check_new_device, module error is handled after checking
if the newdev should go as broadcast-installation device in the functions
tick_check_percpu and tick_check_preferred. In case the try_module_get returns
false, the above 2 calls are extra thus wasting CPU cycles.
Shifting the try_module_get as first error handling saves CPU cycles when there
is nothing to do in case of module related error.
Signed-off-by:Gaurav Jindal<gaurav.jindal@...eadtrum.com>
Co-developed-by:Sanjeev Yadav<sanjeev.yadav@...eadtrum.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 4fcd99e..23faf4a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
td = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, cpu);
curdev = td->evtdev;
+ if (!try_module_get(newdev->owner))
+ return;
+
/* cpu local device ? */
if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, cpu))
goto out_bc;
@@ -315,8 +318,6 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
if (!tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev))
goto out_bc;
- if (!try_module_get(newdev->owner))
- return;
/*
* Replace the eventually existing device by the new
Powered by blists - more mailing lists