[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <57982DB8.4050703@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:42:48 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>
Cc: chanwoo@...nel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, cpgs@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] extcon: Add the support for extcon property according
to extcon type
Hi Chris,
On 2016년 07월 27일 11:09, Chris Zhong wrote:
> Hi Guernter
>
> On 07/27/2016 09:44 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>>> > +
>>>> > +/* Properties of EXTCON_TYPE_DISP. */
>>>> > +#define EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MIN 150
>>>> > +#define EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MAX 150
>>>> > +#define EXTCON_PROP_DISP_CNT (EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MAX -
>>>> EXTCON_PROP_DISP_MIN)
>>>>
>>>> + 1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ok.
>>>
>>> Tested with these "+1", it works for my DP patch.
>>>
>> You should be able to use
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/363623/1 as baseline (if
>> you didn't do that already).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guenter
>
> Thanks Guenter, and I saw this bug has fixed in extcon-test branch.
>
>
Do you test it with extcon_set_property_capability()?
And if you test this patch-es, could you send the tested-by tag for these patches?
I'll send the next version after a few days.
Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists