[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5e6441a147be1d796620d1e302e1c73daa8c0b86.1469656370.git.allenbh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:05:04 -0400
From: Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: check signoff when reading stdin
Before, signoff was not checked if the filename is '-', indicating
reading the patch from stdin. This causes commands such as below not to
warn about a missing signoff.
git show --pretty=email | scripts/checkpatch.pl -
As a workaround, the command could be modified to refer to stdin by a
name other than '-'. The workaround is not an elegant solution, because
elsewhere checkpatch uses the fact that filename equals '-' is special
for stdin, such as setting '$vname' to 'Your patch'.
git show --pretty=email | scripts/checkpatch.pl /dev/stdin
This change causes checkpatch to check for a missing signoff line, even
if the filename is '-', as in the first variation of the command.
Signed-off-by: Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 4904ced676d4..83acbac10705 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6045,7 +6045,7 @@ sub process {
ERROR("NOT_UNIFIED_DIFF",
"Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch\n");
}
- if ($is_patch && $filename ne '-' && $chk_signoff && $signoff == 0) {
+ if ($is_patch && $chk_signoff && $signoff == 0) {
ERROR("MISSING_SIGN_OFF",
"Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)\n");
}
--
2.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists