[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160727061229.GA16943@Karyakshetra>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:42:30 +0530
From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC] net/mlx5_core/en_main: Remove deprecated create_workqueue
alloc_ordered_workqueue() with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set replaces
deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue(). This is the identity
conversion.
A dedicated workqueue has been used since mlx5e workqueue was created to
handle all mlx5e specific tasks. This is in preparation for vxlan using
the mlx5e workqueue in order to schedule port add/remove operations.
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has been set to guarantee forward progress under memory
pressure.
Can the workitems be executed concurrently?
Are the workitems being used on a memory reclaim path?
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index fd43929..1a96445 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -3042,7 +3042,7 @@ static void *mlx5e_create_netdev(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
- priv->wq = create_singlethread_workqueue("mlx5e");
+ priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("mlx5e", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
if (!priv->wq)
goto err_free_netdev;
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists