[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1469681535-25159-1-git-send-email-binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:22:12 +0530
From: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] *** Latency Histogram ***
Hi,
I was looking at these RT kernel patches and was wondering why it has
not been upstreamed yet. I have made a few changes to these patches to
make it compliant with upstream submission process. Also did a minimal
testing on my msm board. Can some one from rt kernel team shed some
light on why this is not upstreamed yet? Also if there some way to test
this throroughly on a board with a high resolution timer running mainline
(and not rt) kernel.
Binoy
Carsten Emde (1):
tracing: Add latency histograms
Yang Shi (1):
trace: Add missing tracer macros
Documentation/trace/histograms.txt | 186 ++++++
include/linux/hrtimer.h | 3 +
include/linux/sched.h | 6 +
include/trace/events/hist.h | 74 +++
include/trace/events/latency_hist.h | 136 +++++
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 20 +
kernel/trace/Kconfig | 104 ++++
kernel/trace/Makefile | 4 +
kernel/trace/latency_hist.c | 1091 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 9 +
10 files changed, 1633 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/trace/histograms.txt
create mode 100644 include/trace/events/hist.h
create mode 100644 include/trace/events/latency_hist.h
create mode 100644 kernel/trace/latency_hist.c
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists