| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <686023493.738.1469713322407.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:42:02 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] Restartable sequences: Add self-tests for PPC
----- On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Boqun Feng boqun.feng@...il.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:59:45AM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> ----- On Jul 27, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Boqun Feng boqun.feng@...il.com wrote:
>>
>> > As rseq syscall is enabled on PPC, implement the self-tests on PPC to
>> > verify the implementation of the syscall.
>> >
>> > Please note we only support 32bit userspace on BE kernel.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
>> > ---
>> > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c | 14 ++++
>> > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
>> > b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
>> > index db25e0a818e5..e2cb1b165f81 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/param_test.c
>> > @@ -75,6 +75,20 @@ static __thread unsigned int yield_mod_cnt, nr_retry;
>> > "bne 222b\n\t" \
>> > "333:\n\t"
>> >
>> > +#elif __PPC__
>> > +#define INJECT_ASM_REG "r18"
>> > +
>> > +#define RSEQ_INJECT_CLOBBER \
>> > + , INJECT_ASM_REG
>> > +
>> > +#define RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(n) \
>> > + "lwz %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", %[loop_cnt_" #n "]\n\t" \
>> > + "cmpwi %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", 0\n\t" \
>> > + "beq 333f\n\t" \
>> > + "222:\n\t" \
>> > + "subic. %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", %%" INJECT_ASM_REG ", 1\n\t" \
>> > + "bne 222b\n\t" \
>> > + "333:\n\t"
>> > #else
>> > #error unsupported target
>> > #endif
>> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
>> > b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
>> > index 791e14cf42ae..dea0bea52566 100644
>> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
>> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.h
>> > @@ -138,6 +138,35 @@ do { \
>> > #define has_fast_acquire_release() 0
>> > #define has_single_copy_load_64() 1
>> >
>> > +#elif __PPC__
>> > +#define smp_mb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
>> > +#define smp_lwsync() __asm__ __volatile__ ("lwsync" : : : "memory")
>> > +#define smp_rmb() smp_lwsync()
>> > +#define smp_wmb() smp_lwsync()
>> > +
>> > +#define smp_load_acquire(p) \
>> > +__extension__ ({ \
>> > + __typeof(*p) ____p1 = READ_ONCE(*p); \
>> > + smp_lwsync(); \
>> > + ____p1; \
>> > +})
>> > +
>> > +#define smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() smp_lwsync()
>> > +
>> > +#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
>> > +do { \
>> > + smp_lwsync(); \
>> > + WRITE_ONCE(*p, v); \
>> > +} while (0)
>> > +
>> > +#define has_fast_acquire_release() 1
>>
>> Can you check if defining has_fast_acquire_release() to 0 speeds up
>> performance significantly ? It turns the smp_lwsync() into a
>> compiler barrier() on the smp_load_acquire() side (fast-path), and
>> turn the smp_lwsync() into a membarrier system call instead of the
>> matching smp_store_release() (slow path).
>>
>
> Good point. Here are the numbers:
>
> Power8 PSeries KVM Guest(64 VCPUs, the host has 16 cores, 128 hardware
> threads):
>
> Counter increment speed (ns/increment)
> 1 thread 2 threads 4 threads 8 threads 16 threads 32 threads
> global increment (baseline) 6.5 N/A N/A N/A
> N/A N/A
> percpu rseq increment 7.0 7.0 7.2 7.2
> 9.3 14.5
> percpu rseq spinlock 18.5 18.5 18.6 18.8
> 25.5 52.7
>
> So looks like defining has_fast_acquire_release() to 0 could benefit the
> cases with more threads in current benchmark. I will send a updated
> patch doing this.
Good to know the lwsync barrier overhead kicks in at that level of
workload on Power8.
>
> And as discussed in IRC, I will also remove jump from rseq_finish()
> fast-path in powerpc asm in the updated patch as you did for x86 and
> ARM.
Allright, thanks!
Mathieu
>
> Regards,
> Boqun
>
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mathieu
>>
>> > +
>> > +# if __PPC64__
>> > +# define has_single_copy_load_64() 1
>> > +# else
>> > +# define has_single_copy_load_64() 0
>> > +# endif
>> > +
>> > #else
>> > #error unsupported target
>> > #endif
>> > @@ -404,6 +433,97 @@ bool rseq_finish(struct rseq_lock *rlock,
>> > : succeed
>> > );
>> > }
>> > +#elif __PPC64__
>> > + {
>> > + /*
>> > + * The __rseq_table section can be used by debuggers to better
>> > + * handle single-stepping through the restartable critical
>> > + * sections.
>> > + */
>> > + __asm__ __volatile__ goto (
>> > + ".pushsection __rseq_table, \"aw\"\n\t"
>> > + ".balign 8\n\t"
>> > + "4:\n\t"
>> > + ".quad 1f, 2f, 3f\n\t"
>> > + ".popsection\n\t"
>> > + "1:\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(1)
>> > + "lis %%r17, (4b)@highest\n\t"
>> > + "ori %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@higher\n\t"
>> > + "rldicr %%r17, %%r17, 32, 31\n\t"
>> > + "oris %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@h\n\t"
>> > + "ori %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@l\n\t"
>> > + "std %%r17, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(2)
>> > + "lwz %%r17, %[current_event_counter]\n\t"
>> > + "li %%r16, 0\n\t"
>> > + "cmpw cr7, %[start_event_counter], %%r17\n\t"
>> > + "bne cr7, 3f\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(3)
>> > + "std %[to_write], 0(%[target])\n\t"
>> > + "2:\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(4)
>> > + "std %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
>> > + "b %l[succeed]\n\t"
>> > + "3:\n\t"
>> > + "li %%r16, 0\n\t"
>> > + "std %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
>> > + : /* no outputs */
>> > + : [start_event_counter]"r"(start_value.event_counter),
>> > + [current_event_counter]"m"(start_value.rseqp->abi.u.e.event_counter),
>> > + [to_write]"r"(to_write),
>> > + [target]"b"(p),
>> > + [rseq_cs]"b"(&start_value.rseqp->abi.rseq_cs)
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_INPUT
>> > + : "r16", "r17", "memory", "cc"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_CLOBBER
>> > + : succeed
>> > + );
>> > + }
>> > +#elif __PPC__
>> > + {
>> > + /*
>> > + * The __rseq_table section can be used by debuggers to better
>> > + * handle single-stepping through the restartable critical
>> > + * sections.
>> > + */
>> > + __asm__ __volatile__ goto (
>> > + ".pushsection __rseq_table, \"aw\"\n\t"
>> > + ".balign 8\n\t"
>> > + "4:\n\t"
>> > + ".long 0x0, 1f, 0x0, 2f, 0x0, 3f\n\t" /* 32 bit only supported on BE */
>> > + ".popsection\n\t"
>> > + "1:\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(1)
>> > + "lis %%r17, (4b)@ha\n\t"
>> > + "addi %%r17, %%r17, (4b)@l\n\t"
>> > + "stw %%r17, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(2)
>> > + "lwz %%r17, %[current_event_counter]\n\t"
>> > + "li %%r16, 0\n\t"
>> > + "cmpw cr7, %[start_event_counter], %%r17\n\t"
>> > + "bne cr7, 3f\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(3)
>> > + "stw %[to_write], 0(%[target])\n\t"
>> > + "2:\n\t"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_ASM(4)
>> > + "stw %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
>> > + "b %l[succeed]\n\t"
>> > + "3:\n\t"
>> > + "li %%r16, 0\n\t"
>> > + "stw %%r16, 0(%[rseq_cs])\n\t"
>> > + : /* no outputs */
>> > + : [start_event_counter]"r"(start_value.event_counter),
>> > + [current_event_counter]"m"(start_value.rseqp->abi.u.e.event_counter),
>> > + [to_write]"r"(to_write),
>> > + [target]"b"(p),
>> > + [rseq_cs]"b"(&start_value.rseqp->abi.rseq_cs)
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_INPUT
>> > + : "r16", "r17", "memory", "cc"
>> > + RSEQ_INJECT_CLOBBER
>> > + : succeed
>> > + );
>> > + }
>> > #else
>> > #error unsupported target
>> > #endif
>> > --
>> > 2.9.0
>>
>> --
>> Mathieu Desnoyers
>> EfficiOS Inc.
> > http://www.efficios.com
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists