linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] usb: core: add power sequence handling for USB devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <579A3065.2080402@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:18:45 -0700
From:	Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@...il.com>
To:	Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	shawnguo@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	k.kozlowski@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	p.zabel@...gutronix.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com,
	festevam@...il.com, oscar@...andei.net, stephen.boyd@...aro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] usb: core: add power sequence handling for USB
 devices

Peter,

On 07/27/2016 06:45 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:25:11AM -0700, Joshua Clayton wrote:
>> Patch 4 does not apply for me
>> (The Makefile has  a "usbcore-$(CONFIG_OF) += of.o"
>> line which I don't see in 4.7 or linux/next master).
>> Is there another patch set this series depends on?
> It seems below patch has not been queued:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/peter.chen/usb.git/commit/?h=add_pwrseq_for_usb&id=2efd73d0f935ffbc66135553da0ac807c0b4c3fe
>
> This pwrseq-lib patch set does not depend on it, I will send patch set
> on top of a clean mainline next time, sorry for confusing. 
>
Good to know.
I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something important.

Thanks,

Joshua Clayton