[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160728175706.GB16852@dtor-ws>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:57:06 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 3/8] firmware: Factor out firmware load helpers
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:55:07AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> +int __firmware_stat_wait(struct firmware_stat *fwst,
> + long timeout)
> +{
> + int err;
> + err = swait_event_interruptible_timeout(fwst->wq,
> + is_fw_sync_done(READ_ONCE(fwst->status)),
> + timeout);
> + if (err == 0 && fwst->status == FW_STATUS_ABORT)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__firmware_stat_wait);
> +
> +void __firmware_stat_set(struct firmware_stat *fwst, unsigned long status)
> +{
> + WRITE_ONCE(fwst->status, status);
> + swake_up(&fwst->wq);
Do we need to notify everyone for FW_STATUS_LOADING status?
The driver users do not care for sure.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists