lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:57:06 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc:	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 3/8] firmware: Factor out firmware load helpers

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:55:07AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> +int __firmware_stat_wait(struct firmware_stat *fwst,
> +				long timeout)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	err = swait_event_interruptible_timeout(fwst->wq,
> +				is_fw_sync_done(READ_ONCE(fwst->status)),
> +				timeout);
> +	if (err == 0 && fwst->status == FW_STATUS_ABORT)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__firmware_stat_wait);
> +
> +void __firmware_stat_set(struct firmware_stat *fwst, unsigned long status)
> +{
> +	WRITE_ONCE(fwst->status, status);
> +	swake_up(&fwst->wq);

Do we need to notify everyone for FW_STATUS_LOADING status?

The driver users do not care for sure.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists