linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160729001244-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:28:23 +0300
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:59:18PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Again, this is still the wrong way around.  A "noiommu" feature is a
> quirk and should not be the default.

Christoph, I'm not sure what you mean by the default here.

We read a register from the device (bit 33 in the feature qword)
and act on it.

The specific register value is 0 on noiommu quirky devices
(it happened to be that way in the past),
and 1 on clean iommu devices.

 static bool vring_use_dma_api(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
+       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM))
+               return true;
+
+       /* Otherwise, we are left to guess. */

As a hypothesis, do you object to use of virtio_has_feature?

Yes this might be confusing but in fact that
is just testing a cached register bit: at init time we read it:

        device_features = dev->config->get_features(dev);

        ....
        vdev->features = device_features

and later

            return vdev->features & BIT_ULL(fbit);

I'll add a comment clarifying that in the next version.

-- 
MST