[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1469674679-8580-31-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:57:59 +0800
From: wei.guo.simon@...il.com
To: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@...il.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@...ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy@...il.com>,
Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@...il.com>,
Chris Smart <chris@...troguy.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 30/30] selftests/powerpc: Fix a build issue
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes the following build failure -
cp_abort.c:90:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
allowed in C99 or C11 mode
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
^
cp_abort.c:90:3: note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or
-std=gnu11 to compile your code
cp_abort.c:97:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
allowed in C99 or C11 mode
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@...il.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
index 5a5b55a..1ce7dce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/context_switch/cp_abort.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int test_cp_abort(void)
/* 128 bytes for a full cache line */
char buf[128] __cacheline_aligned;
cpu_set_t cpuset;
- int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid;
+ int fd1[2], fd2[2], pid, i;
char c;
/* only run this test on a P9 or later */
@@ -87,14 +87,14 @@ int test_cp_abort(void)
FAIL_IF(pid < 0);
if (!pid) {
- for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
FAIL_IF((write(fd1[WRITE_FD], &c, 1)) != 1);
FAIL_IF((read(fd2[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1);
/* A paste succeeds if CR0 EQ bit is set */
FAIL_IF(paste(buf) & 0x20000000);
}
} else {
- for (int i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++) {
FAIL_IF((read(fd1[READ_FD], &c, 1)) != 1);
copy(buf);
FAIL_IF((write(fd2[WRITE_FD], &c, 1) != 1));
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists