[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160729161521.GL9681@localhost>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:45:21 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, bardliao@...ltek.com,
oder_chiou@...ltek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5659: Add mclk controls
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:14:20AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:57:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > This device seems to be used on x86 systems so we'll need to ensure that
> > > they register clocks for this. They really should set this up using
> > > quirks keyed off DMI information or similar so it's hidden from other
> > > systems.
>
> > Hmm..the change defines this mclk as a optional property so I'm
> > not sure how it would affect x86 systems. (Would love to refine
>
> Ah, clk_prepare_enable() silently ignores NULL as an argument? It is a
> bit messy to do things that way but might be the most practical thing.
>
> > it to make it impactless.) Since it's literally hidden, any way
> > that I can manually ensure it? Or just wait for an ack from x86
> > developers?
>
> Hopefully they'll speak up - we're in the merge window anyway so it'll
> be just over a week before this can go into -next.
Yeah I am not aware of any plan to have clks on x86. For audio we are not
going to use much. ACPI and controller w/ firmware does the job.
I have added Darren, he oversee platform things so might know if clocks
would be there in future..
Thanks
--
~Vinod
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists