[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160731082304.05f4aad7@mschwide>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 08:23:04 -0400
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] s390: Define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH for ARCH_DLINFO
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:59:53 +0100
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com> wrote:
> AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH should be defined with the maximum number of
> NEW_AUX_ENT entries that ARCH_DLINFO can contain, but it wasn't defined
> for s390 at all even though ARCH_DLINFO can contain one NEW_AUX_ENT when
> VDSO is enabled.
>
> This shouldn't be a problem as AT_VECTOR_SIZE_BASE includes space for
> AT_BASE_PLATFORM which s390 doesn't use, but lets define it now and add
> the comment above ARCH_DLINFO as found in several other architectures to
> remind future modifiers of ARCH_DLINFO to keep AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH up to
> date.
>
> Fixes: b020632e40c3 ("[S390] introduce vdso on s390")
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
The patch makes sense. I not quite sure about the checkpoint-restore code
that clears the last two entries of the user_auxv[] without knowing how
many aux entries there really are. That seems kind of strange.
I will the patch to our repositories and we'll give it a spin. If there
is no fallout I queue it to linux-s390.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists