[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160731092546.723c933c@mschwide>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 09:25:46 -0400
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Michael Grundy <grundym@...ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace/jprobes/s390: Fix conflict between jprobes and
function graph tracing
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:21:14 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:39:33PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:26:41 +0200
> > Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This fixes the same issue Steven already fixed for x86
> > > in following commit:
> > >
> > > 237d28db036e ftrace/jprobes/x86: Fix conflict between jprobes and function graph tracing
> > >
> > > It fixes the crash, that happens when function graph tracing
> > > and jprobes are used simultaneously. Please refer to above
> > > commit for details.
> >
> > I'm guessing that this should go in via the s390 tree.
>
> oops, I forgot to CC s390 mailing list.. CC-ing now
>
> I can repost if needed
This is not necessary. I have seen your original patch and could test
it now. As expected it crashes without the patch and works find with
your patch.
Applied to linux-s390. Thanks.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists