[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1470043872.5903.5.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:31:12 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: Fix PELT integrity for new tasks
On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 15:30 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> What's the meaning of "the task is hashed before we call
> wake_up_new_task()"?
See fork.c::copy_process()
/*
* Make it visible to the rest of the system, but dont wake it up yet.
* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling!
*/
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
....
Powered by blists - more mailing lists