[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160801122424.GA18162@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:24:24 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@...o.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, labbott@...oraproject.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, jeremy.linton@....com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, zijun_hu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 05:42:19PM +0800, zijun_hu wrote:
> >From 07b9216ec3494515e7a6c41e0333eb8782427db3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:04:59 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix address fault during mapping fdt region
>
> fdt_check_header() accesses other fileds of fdt header but
> the first 8 bytes such as version; so accessing unmapped
> address fault happens if fdt region locates below align
> boundary nearly during mapping fdt region, or expressed as
> (offset + sizeof(struct fdt_header)) > SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE
>
> fdt header size at least is mapped in order to avoid the issue
>
> Signed-off-by: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists