linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v3] Coccinelle: Script to replace allocate and memset with zalloc functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0cdfaa73-d2ba-acc3-523f-559f14fadbc1@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:45:22 +0200
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
	Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v3] Coccinelle: Script to replace allocate and
 memset with zalloc functions

>>>> @vz_combined
>>>>  depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@
>>>> type T;
>>>> T* pointer;
>>>> +statement S;
>>>> expression express;
>>>> @@
>>>>  pointer =
>>>> -          vmalloc
>>>> +          vzalloc
>>>>            (...);
>>>>  if (!d)
>>>>     S
>>>> -memset(d, 0, sizeof(
>>>> (
>>>> -T
>>>> |
>>>> -*(express)
>>>> )
>>>> -));
> 
> Actually, this is a mess.  pointer, d, and express are all supposed to be
> the same thing, as they were in the original rule.
> 
> Furthermore, this shows a reason why the original rule was better.

There is a trade-off between several unique SmPL rules and other combined
variants which could eventually work with two SmPL disjunctions.

Regards,
Markus