lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3202429.X9nACUOoOm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Tue, 02 Aug 2016 01:44:41 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
Cc:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] cpufreq / sched: Add flags argument to cpufreq_update_util()

On Monday, August 01, 2016 12:59:30 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:57:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 01, 2016 09:33:12 AM Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:36:46AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > +#define UUF_RT	0x01
> > > 
> > > What does UUF stand for?
> > 
> > "Utilization upadte flag".
> 
> I had wondered the same - in my patchset I used CPUFREQ_SCHED_UPDATE_* for the
> prefixes, though I guess some may object to the length.

Well, OK.

I guess something like SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT etc would be sufficient?

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ