linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP8UFD12Jk0s0HPPWS3CqFcB37gzhzZZi-V0PfqrRhZO4zhHOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Aug 2016 07:04:15 +0200
From:	Christian Couder <christian.couder@...il.com>
To:	Richard Ipsum <richard.ipsum@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, git <git@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dborowitz@...gle.com,
	Omar Jarjur <ojarjur@...gle.com>,
	Harry Lawrence <hazbo@....com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-series: track changes to a patch series over time

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Richard Ipsum
<richard.ipsum@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:40:55PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> I'd welcome any feedback, whether on the interface and workflow, the
>> internals and collaboration, ideas on presenting diffs of patch series,
>> or anything else.
>
> This looks awesome!
>
> I've been working on some similar stuff for a while also.[1][2]
>
> I'm particularly interested in trying to establish a standard for
> storing review data in git. I've got a prototype for doing that[3],
> and an example tool that uses it[4]. The tool is still incomplete/buggy though.

There is also git-appraise (https://github.com/google/git-appraise)
written in Go to store code review data in Git.
It looks like it stores its data in git notes and can be integrated
with Rust (https://github.com/Nemo157/git-appraise-rs).

> There seem to be a number of us trying to solve this in our different ways,
> it would be great to coordinate our efforts.

Yeah, I agree.