linux-kernel - [PATCH 1072/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802121353.21587-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date:	Tue,  2 Aug 2016 20:13:53 +0800
From:	Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	jiangshanlai@...il.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
	baolex.ni@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	vkuznets@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com, tj@...nel.org,
	jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 1072/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c7f1bc4..d93a882 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -114,13 +114,13 @@ LIST_HEAD(rcu_struct_flavors);
 
 /* Dump rcu_node combining tree at boot to verify correct setup. */
 static bool dump_tree;
-module_param(dump_tree, bool, 0444);
+module_param(dump_tree, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 /* Control rcu_node-tree auto-balancing at boot time. */
 static bool rcu_fanout_exact;
-module_param(rcu_fanout_exact, bool, 0444);
+module_param(rcu_fanout_exact, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 /* Increase (but not decrease) the RCU_FANOUT_LEAF at boot time. */
 static int rcu_fanout_leaf = RCU_FANOUT_LEAF;
-module_param(rcu_fanout_leaf, int, 0444);
+module_param(rcu_fanout_leaf, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 int rcu_num_lvls __read_mostly = RCU_NUM_LVLS;
 /* Number of rcu_nodes at specified level. */
 static int num_rcu_lvl[] = NUM_RCU_LVL_INIT;
@@ -166,27 +166,27 @@ static int kthread_prio = CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO;
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO */
 static int kthread_prio = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST) ? 1 : 0;
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO */
-module_param(kthread_prio, int, 0644);
+module_param(kthread_prio, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /* Delay in jiffies for grace-period initialization delays, debug only. */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_PREINIT
 static int gp_preinit_delay = CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_PREINIT_DELAY;
-module_param(gp_preinit_delay, int, 0644);
+module_param(gp_preinit_delay, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_PREINIT */
 static const int gp_preinit_delay;
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_PREINIT */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT
 static int gp_init_delay = CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT_DELAY;
-module_param(gp_init_delay, int, 0644);
+module_param(gp_init_delay, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT */
 static const int gp_init_delay;
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_INIT */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_CLEANUP
 static int gp_cleanup_delay = CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_CLEANUP_DELAY;
-module_param(gp_cleanup_delay, int, 0644);
+module_param(gp_cleanup_delay, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_CLEANUP */
 static const int gp_cleanup_delay;
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_SLOW_CLEANUP */
@@ -396,24 +396,24 @@ static long blimit = 10;	/* Maximum callbacks per rcu_do_batch. */
 static long qhimark = 10000;	/* If this many pending, ignore blimit. */
 static long qlowmark = 100;	/* Once only this many pending, use blimit. */
 
-module_param(blimit, long, 0444);
-module_param(qhimark, long, 0444);
-module_param(qlowmark, long, 0444);
+module_param(blimit, long, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param(qhimark, long, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param(qlowmark, long, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 static ulong jiffies_till_first_fqs = ULONG_MAX;
 static ulong jiffies_till_next_fqs = ULONG_MAX;
 static bool rcu_kick_kthreads;
 
-module_param(jiffies_till_first_fqs, ulong, 0644);
-module_param(jiffies_till_next_fqs, ulong, 0644);
-module_param(rcu_kick_kthreads, bool, 0644);
+module_param(jiffies_till_first_fqs, ulong, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param(jiffies_till_next_fqs, ulong, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param(rcu_kick_kthreads, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 /*
  * How long the grace period must be before we start recruiting
  * quiescent-state help from rcu_note_context_switch().
  */
 static ulong jiffies_till_sched_qs = HZ / 20;
-module_param(jiffies_till_sched_qs, ulong, 0644);
+module_param(jiffies_till_sched_qs, ulong, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 static bool rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
 				  struct rcu_data *rdp);
-- 
2.9.2