[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9e3b298-d655-2ee8-3d19-e581501aee1d@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:59:40 +0300
From: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>, <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/6] x86/arch_prctl/vdso: add ARCH_MAP_VDSO_*
On 07/12/2016 05:14 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/11, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I'm starting to wonder if we should finally suck it up and give
>> special mappings a non-NULL vm_file so we can track them properly.
>> Oleg, weren't you thinking of doing that for some other reason?
>
> Yes, uprobes. Currently we can't probe vdso page(s).
So, to make sure, that I've understood correctly, I need to:
o add vm_file to vdso/vvar vmas, __install_special_mapping will init
them;
o place array pages[] inside f_mapping;
o create f_inode for each file -- for this we need some mount point, so
I'll create something like vdsofs, register this filesystem and mount
it in initcall (or like do_basic_setup - as it's done by shmem, i.e).
Is this the idea, or I got it wrong?
And maybe the idea is to create fake vm_file for just reference
counting, but do not treat/init it like file with inode, etc?
So with fake file I can also check if vdso is mapped already, but
I'm sure the fake file will not help Oleg with uprobes.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists