[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160802063419.GG3296@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:34:19 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 7/8] Input: ims-pcu: use firmware_stat instead of
completion
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 07:49:19AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >The sysdata API's main goal rather is to provide a flexible API first,
> >compartamentalizing the usermode helper was secondary. But now it seems
> >I may just also add devm support too to help simplify code further.
>
> I missed the point that you plan to add usermode helper support to
> the sysdata API.
I had no such plans, when I have asked folks so far about "hey are you
really in need for it, OK what for? " and "what extended uses do you
envision?" so I far I have not gotten any replies at all. So -- instead
sysdata currently ignores it.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists