[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802115127.5926-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:51:27 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: kishon@...com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com,
jgross@...e.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
pawel@...iak.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0839/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c b/drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c
index 385362e..f934d7f 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-xgene.c
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ struct xgene_phy_ctx {
*/
static int preA3Chip;
MODULE_PARM_DESC(preA3Chip, "Enable pre-A3 chip support (1=enable 0=disable)");
-module_param_named(preA3Chip, preA3Chip, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(preA3Chip, preA3Chip, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
static void sds_wr(void __iomem *csr_base, u32 indirect_cmd_reg,
u32 indirect_data_reg, u32 addr, u32 data)
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists