[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea8392e9-669c-6019-e149-f389fe8a14a3@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:12:04 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc: david.vrabel@...rix.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: Make VPMU init message look less
scary
On 02/08/16 09:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 02.08.16 at 08:43, <JGross@...e.com> wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
>> @@ -547,8 +547,11 @@ void xen_pmu_init(int cpu)
>> return;
>>
>> fail:
>> - pr_info_once("Could not initialize VPMU for cpu %d, error %d\n",
>> - cpu, err);
>> + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + pr_info_once("VPMU disabled by hypervisor.\n");
>> + else
>> + pr_info_once("Could not initialize VPMU for cpu %d, error %d\n",
>> + cpu, err);
>
> I'm sorry for not already having thought about this for v1, but
> what about older hypervisors, where the hypercall would return
> -ENOSYS?
I wasn't aware of that possibility. It should be covered, of course!
V3 will be sent soon...
Thanks for noticing now,
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists