[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802113508.26531-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:35:08 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, royale@...ezo.com,
hdegoede@...hat.com, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [PATCH 0667/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-vmalloc.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-vmalloc.c
index 2ff7fcc..e8b7c9d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-vmalloc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-vmalloc.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
}
static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("helper module to manage video4linux vmalloc buffers");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists